Implementing a
new EMR will present many opportunities for Failure
Implementing a
new EMR will present many opportunities for failure. Your challenges may
or may not be at the failure level. Some will surely not appear to be what they
really are.
Relatively
speaking the software and technology changes in an EMR transition will be
the easy part. Bringing your staff up to speed on the new EMR will take time,
patience, training and retraining. It will probably take a year or more to feel
comfortable with the software and perhaps longer before you have integrated
most of the salient features of the technology.
An EMR is not
a standalone product. It is integrated with a Practice Management System or
Patient Billing System, either tightly or via an interface. The EMR is
continually being enhanced to accommodate Meaningful Use, ANSI 5010 and
ICD-10 as well as other features and improvements. It has links to
e-prescribing, voice recognition, appointment reminder, labs and hospitals,
state and local agencies for immunization reporting and more.
Your EMR is
also under the control of an operating system, probably some version of MS
Windows. That control is growing more useful AND ominous with every release.
You have printers, fax machines which may be physical or logical, scanners and
auto phone dialers. You may have tablets and smart phones attached or with
remote access. Your server may be in-house, in the Cloud or provided by SaaS
(software as a service).
You may or may
not use a data conversion to get your data into the new EMR, either way you
will face problems.
Simply stated
you have a complex technology environment which is growing in its integration,
data sharing and complexity. And your dependency on your "system" is
becoming indispensible.
At first
glance the staffing considerations do not appear quite so complex. But there
are several disciplines represented in medical clinics. First are the medical
professionals, doctors, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and nurses.
On the business side there are the management, accounting, marketing, billing
and coding, receptionist, and technology skills. In the end, people present the
bigger problem with the greater number of opportunities for failure.
The difficulty
presented by technological complexity can be minimized in three significant and
relatively easy ways to achieve.
1. Hire
professionals either on staff or as consultants, depending on your need. Do not
go cheap. Do not let someone on your staff (or a relative) who seems to know a
lot about computers but for who technology is not a first language, drive this
effort.
2. Get it done
right before you implement your EMR. Plan, test and re-test.
3. Get regular
maintenance. This will cost extra up front but be less expensive in the long
term. Don't wait for a problem to show itself. By then the repair work will be
far greater as will its cost and you may also encounter lost or damaged data.
The challenges
presented by staff require what they always have, new or revised office
procedures, testing, training, hand holding, patience and time. In short it is
a lot of work to bring your staff up to speed.
Office
procedures need to be reviewed and revised often during the implementation
process to accommodate and adjust to the software, to changes in the staff
where new talent is added or a talent loss occurs, and the addition of new
medical services. It is unreasonable to expect a resolution to internal changes
of this nature in the first or second try. Give it some time and make
adjustments as you learn.
In summary,
don't underestimate the complexity of implementing a new EMR.